Śaṅkaraon Brahma Sūtra 2.3.1
Advaita Vedānta
Sūtra
न वियदश्रुतेः
na viyadaśruteḥ
Sūtra translation
Ether ^ (does) not (originate), on account of the absence of scriptural statement.
In the Veddnta-texts we meet in different places with different statements concerning the origination of various things. Some of those passages declare that ether origi- nated ; some do not. Some record the origination of air others do not. Other passages again make analogous — statements concerning the individual soul and the vital airs, ^Similarly we observe that other scriptural texts con- tradict one another concerning order of succession and the like. —Now, as we ourselves have inferred the worthless- ne.ss of other philosophical doctrines from their mutual contradictions, a suspicion might arise that our doctrine is equally worthless, owing to its intrinsic contradictions. Hence a new discussion is begun in order to clear from all doubt the sense of all those Vedanta-texts which refer to creation, and thus to remove the suspicion alluded to. Here we have to consider in the first place the question ' Here, as generally in the preceding parts of this translation, — — is rendered by ‘ ether.’ There is no doubt that occasionally the appropriate and in some cases the only possible rendering is not ‘ ether ' but ‘ space ; ’ but the former rendering, after all, best agrees with the general Vedantic view of aka^a. The Veddntins do not clearly distinguish between empty space and an exceedingly fine matter filling all space, and thus it happens that in many cases where we speak of the former they speak of ak^ja, i.e. the all-pervading substratum of sound; which howsoever a?fem^ated is yet one oT the material elements, and as such belongs to the same categoi^^ as air, fire, water, and earth. B2 • whether ether has an origin or not. —The piirvapakshin maintains that ether does not originate, since there is no scriptural statement to that effect. For in the chapter which treats of the origin (of the world) ether is not mentioned at all. In the passage ‘ In the beginning there was that only which is, one only, without a second ’ the Ar//dndogya at first introduces Brahman as the general subject-matter, by means of the clause ‘ that which is,' and thereupon (in the passages ‘ It thought,* ‘ It sent forth fire,* &c.) records the origin of three elements, viz. fire, water, and earth ; giving the first place to fire which (ordinarily) occupies the middle place among the five elements ^ Now, as scriptural statement is our (only) authority in the origination of the knowledge of supersensuous things, and as there is no scriptural statement declaring the origin of ether, ether must be considered to have no origin.