Brahma Sūtra 2.2.13

Śaṅkara

Advaita Vedānta

Numbered 2.2.14 in this text

Sūtra

नित्यमेव च भावात्

nityameva ca bhāvāt

Sūtra translation

And on account of the permanent existence (of activity or non-activity).

Moreover, the atoms would have to be assumed as either essentially active (moving) or essentially non-active, or both or neither; there being no fifth

Read Śaṅkara’s commentary →

Rāmānuja

Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedānta

Sūtra

नित्यमेव च भावात्

nityameva ca bhāvāt

Sūtra translation

And because (the world also) would thus be eternal.

The samavâya is a relation, and if that relation is eternal that to which the relation belongs must also be eternal, so that we

Read Rāmānuja’s commentary →

Madhva

Dvaita Vedānta

Numbered 2.2.14 in this text

Sūtra

नित्यमेव च भावात्

nityameva ca bhāvāt

Sūtra translation

Besides, (the cause) being permanently present, (the production of the effect also would have to be admitted) as perpetual.

The material cause, viz., the atoms, as well as Sama- vaya (the relation of inherence) being granted to be eter- nally present and it

Read Madhva’s commentary →