Brahma Sūtra 2.2.43

Śaṅkara

Advaita Vedānta

Numbered 2.2.44 in this text

Sūtra

विज्ञानादिभावे वा तदप्रतिषेधः

vijñānādibhāve vā tadapratiṣedhaḥ

Sūtra translation

Or (if) in consequence of the existence of knowledge, &c. (Vâsudeva, &c. be taken as Lords), yet there is non-exclusion of that (i.e. the objection raised in Sûtra 42).

Let us then—the Bhâgavatas may say—understand by Sa@nkarshana, and so on, not the individual soul, the mind, &c., but rather Lords, i.e. powerful beings

Read Śaṅkara’s commentary →

Rāmānuja

Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedānta

Numbered 2.2.42 in this text

Sūtra

विज्ञानादिभावे वा तदप्रतिषेधः

vijñānādibhāve vā tadapratiṣedhaḥ

Sūtra translation

Or, if they are of the nature of that which is knowledge and so on, there is no contradiction to that (i.e. the Bhâgavata doctrine).

The 'or' sets aside the view previously maintained. By 'that which is knowledge and so on' we have to understand the highest Brahman. If

Read Rāmānuja’s commentary →

Madhva

Dvaita Vedānta

Numbered 2.2.44 in this text

Sūtra

विज्ञानादिभावेवा तदप्रतिषेधः

vijñānādibhāvevā tadapratiṣedhaḥ

Sūtra translation

Further if wisdom, etc., be alto supposed (for him), there is no denying of that ; (then the system lapses into the Pâsupata).

If wisdom and the necessary organs be supposed to be possessed by tlxe'Purusha (Sadasiva), then from him alone origination, etc., may proceed and there

Read Madhva’s commentary →