Brahma Sūtra 1.3.18

Śaṅkara

Advaita Vedānta

Sūtra

इतरपरामर्शात्स इति चेन्नासंभवात्

itaraparāmarśātsa iti cennāsaṃbhavāt

Sūtra translation

If it be said that the other one (i.e. the individual soul) (is meant) on account of a reference to it (made in a complementary passage), (we say) no, on account of the impossibility.

If the small (ether) is to be explained as the highest Lord on account of a complementary passage, then, the pûrvapakshin resumes, we point

Read Śaṅkara’s commentary →

Rāmānuja

Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedānta

Numbered 1.3.17 in this text

Sūtra

इतरपरामर्शात्स इति चेन्नासंभवात्

itaraparāmarśātsa iti cennāsaṃbhavāt

Sūtra translation

If it be said that on account of reference to the other one he is meant; we say no, on account of impossibility.

An objection is raised to the argumentation that, on account of complementary passages, the small ether must be explained to mean the highest Self.

Read Rāmānuja’s commentary →

Madhva

Dvaita Vedānta

Sūtra

इतरपरामर्शात्स इति चेन्नासम्भवात्

itaraparāmarśātsa iti cennāsambhavāt

Sūtra translation

If it be said that from the reference to the other, it is the individual soul (that is in the lotus of the heart), we say ‘ nof on account of the impossibility (of the attributes in him).

" Having reached the Highest Light, (he) issues in his essential nature" (Ch. VIII-xii-3); aud “this is Atman )y (Ch. IV-xv-i) ; so he

Read Madhva’s commentary →