Brahma Sūtra 2.1.21

Śaṅkara

Advaita Vedānta

Sūtra

इतरव्यपदेशाद्धिताकरणादिदोषप्रसक्तिः

itaravyapadeśāddhitākaraṇādidoṣaprasaktiḥ

Sūtra translation

On account of the other (i.e. the individual soul) being designated (as non-different from Brahman) there would attach (to Brahman) various faults, as, for instance, not doing what is beneficial.

Another objection is raised against the doctrine of an intelligent cause of the world.—If that doctrine is accepted, certain faults, as, for instance, doing

Read Śaṅkara’s commentary →

Rāmānuja

Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedānta

Sūtra

इतरव्यपदेशाद्धिताकरणादिदोषप्रसक्तिः

itaravyapadeśāddhitākaraṇādidoṣaprasaktiḥ

Sūtra translation

From the designation of the 'other' (as non-different from Brahman) there result (Brahman's) not creating what is beneficial, and other imperfections.

'Thou art that'; 'this Self is Brahman'—these and similar texts which declare the non-difference of the world from Brahman, teach, as has been said

Read Rāmānuja’s commentary →

Madhva

Dvaita Vedānta

Numbered 2.1.22 in this text

Sūtra

इतरव्यपदेशाद्धिताकरणादिदोषप्रसक्तिः

itaravyapadeśāddhitākaraṇādidoṣaprasaktiḥ

Sūtra translation

If it be said that on account of the other7s (souVs) authorship being declared, lit is the absolute agent, then, it might be said, he (the creator) is liable to the defects of being unable to accomplish his own good, etc.

If the individual soul is held to be the sole agent (creator), that would be inconsistent with the soul's inability to do what is

Read Madhva’s commentary →