Brahma Sūtra 2.1.23

Śaṅkara

Advaita Vedānta

Sūtra

अश्मादिवच्च तदनुपपत्तिः

aśmādivacca tadanupapattiḥ

Sūtra translation

And because the case is analogous to that of stones, &c. (the objections raised) cannot be established.

As among minerals, which are all mere modifications of earth, nevertheless great variety is observed, some being precious gems, such as diamonds, lapis lazuli,

Read Śaṅkara’s commentary →

Rāmānuja

Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedānta

Sūtra

अश्मादिवच्च तदनुपपत्तिः

aśmādivacca tadanupapattiḥ

Sūtra translation

And as in the analogous case of stones and the like, there is impossibility of that.

In the same way as it is impossible that the different non-sentient things such as stones, iron, wood, herbs, &c., which are of an

Read Rāmānuja’s commentary →

Madhva

Dvaita Vedānta

Numbered 2.1.24 in this text

Sūtra

अश्मादिवच्च तदनुपपत्तिः

aśmādivacca tadanupapattiḥ

Sūtra translation

Betides, (that the soul, should be by analogy of the creator) is impossible, to the case of stone, etc.

Though a spiritual existence, the soul being depend- ent (and powerless) like stones, etc., it is not possible for him to act independently (i.e.,

Read Madhva’s commentary →