Brahma Sūtra 2.4.22

Śaṅkara

Advaita Vedānta

Sūtra

वैशेष्यात्तु तद्वादस्तद्वादः

vaiśeṣyāttu tadvādastadvādaḥ

Sūtra translation

But on account of their distinctive nature there is a (distinctive) designation of them.

The word ‘ but ’ repels the objection raised. By ‘ distinctive nature’ we have to understand preponderance. Although all things are tripartite, yet

Read Śaṅkara’s commentary →

Rāmānuja

Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedānta

Numbered 2.4.19 in this text

Sūtra

वैशेष्यात्तु तद्वादस्तद्वादः

vaiśeṣyāttu tadvādastadvādaḥ

Sūtra translation

But on account of their distinctive nature there is that designation, that designation.

Each element indeed is of a threefold nature, owing to the primary tripartition; but as in each mixed element one definite element prevails—so that

Read Rāmānuja’s commentary →

Madhva

Dvaita Vedānta

Numbered 2.4.23 in this text

Sūtra

वैशेष्यात्तु तद्वादस्तद्वादः

vaiśeṣyāttu tadvādastadvādaḥ

Sūtra translation

Only on account of preponderance of some particular element in the constitution of each body such special statements proceed), such special statements (proceed).

The special statements proceed only with reference to the greater proportions of the (constituent) elements entering into (a product or a body). It is

Read Madhva’s commentary →