Brahma Sūtra 3.4.40

Śaṅkara

Advaita Vedānta

Sūtra

तद्भूतस्य तु नातद्भावो जैमिनेरपि नियमातद्रूपाभावेभ्यः

tadbhūtasya tu nātadbhāvo jaiminerapi niyamātadrūpābhāvebhyaḥ

Sūtra translation

But of him who has become that (i.e. entered on a higher d.rrama) there is no becoming not that (i.e. descending to a lower one), according to CTai- mini also, on account of restrictive rule, absence of such like (i.e. statements of descent), and non- existence (of good custom).

It has been established that there are stages of life for which chastity is obligatory. A doubt here arises whether one who has entered

Read Śaṅkara’s commentary →

Rāmānuja

Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedānta

Sūtra

तद्भूतस्य तु नातद्भावो जैमिनेरपि नियमात्तद्रूपाभावेभ्यः

tadbhūtasya tu nātadbhāvo jaiminerapi niyamāttadrūpābhāvebhyaḥ

Sūtra translation

But of him who has become that there is no becoming not that, according to Jaimini also, on account of (Scripture) restraining from the absence of the forms of that.

The doubt here arises whether those also who have fallen from the state of life of a Naishthika, Vaikhânasa or Pârivrâjaka are qualified for

Read Rāmānuja’s commentary →

Madhva

Dvaita Vedānta

Sūtra

तद्भूतस्य तु तद्भावो जैमिनेरपि नियमात् पाभावेभ्यः

tadbhūtasya tu tadbhāvo jaiminerapi niyamāt pābhāvebhyaḥ

Sūtra translation

It is the conclusion also of Gaimini that what each is is its own nature, as may he seen from Brutis declaring the invariable rule, the absence of (acquiring) the nature it has not, (and the permanency of its own nature).

The state of being Asura belongs to the Asura class alone; and the state of being god also belongs only to the class of

Read Madhva’s commentary →